Aims The Italian general practitioners (GPs) are not directly employed by the National Health Service but work as independent contractors. Their activity and their salary are managed at the national, regional, and local level. This paper analyses the Tuscany Region case study to investigate if primary care's target‐setting styles are associated with different GP perceptions, by comparing nine different local agreements to a survey on 102GPs. We propose a classification of the different target‐setting (ideal typical) styles, ranging from “financial governance” , mainly based on financial targets, to “clinical governance” (CG), that mainly relies on clinical and quality targets. Findings Results show that GPs are more likely to have a more favourable attitude toward primary care managerial tools if they have certain characteristics, ie, quality measures. This suggest that target setting system might promote both the GPs' compliance to the targets set by the agreement and the involvement of the GPs in the LHA's governance processes too. Conclusions The managerial tools could pave the way to overcome the classical “trade unionist” relationship between the regional and local authority and the GPs, working as a “trait d'union” between the two players.

Trade union or trait d'union? Setting targets for general practitioners: a regional case study

Sara Barsanti
;
Federico Vola;Bonciani Manila
2019-01-01

Abstract

Aims The Italian general practitioners (GPs) are not directly employed by the National Health Service but work as independent contractors. Their activity and their salary are managed at the national, regional, and local level. This paper analyses the Tuscany Region case study to investigate if primary care's target‐setting styles are associated with different GP perceptions, by comparing nine different local agreements to a survey on 102GPs. We propose a classification of the different target‐setting (ideal typical) styles, ranging from “financial governance” , mainly based on financial targets, to “clinical governance” (CG), that mainly relies on clinical and quality targets. Findings Results show that GPs are more likely to have a more favourable attitude toward primary care managerial tools if they have certain characteristics, ie, quality measures. This suggest that target setting system might promote both the GPs' compliance to the targets set by the agreement and the involvement of the GPs in the LHA's governance processes too. Conclusions The managerial tools could pave the way to overcome the classical “trade unionist” relationship between the regional and local authority and the GPs, working as a “trait d'union” between the two players.
2019
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Barsanti_et_al-2019-The_International_Journal_of_Health_Planning_and_Management.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione 768.82 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
768.82 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11382/529973
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
social impact