From Promusicae to date, the fair balance test has evolved into an articulated, sector-specific doctrine, but loopholes still affect its reliability and consistency over time. Waiting for the CJEU’s boundary-setting responses in Funke Medien, Pelham and Spiegel Online, this article sketches the evolution of the fair balance case law, draws a conceptual map schematizing the key elements of the doctrine, identifies its gaps, and illustrates how the CJEU can fix them.
A Decade of Fair Balance Doctrine, and How to Fix It: Copyright versus Fundamental Rights before the CJEU from Promusicae to Funke Medien, Pelham and Spiegel Online
C. Sganga
2019-01-01
Abstract
From Promusicae to date, the fair balance test has evolved into an articulated, sector-specific doctrine, but loopholes still affect its reliability and consistency over time. Waiting for the CJEU’s boundary-setting responses in Funke Medien, Pelham and Spiegel Online, this article sketches the evolution of the fair balance case law, draws a conceptual map schematizing the key elements of the doctrine, identifies its gaps, and illustrates how the CJEU can fix them.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Sganga_A decade of fair balance doctrine and how to fix it_EIPR_11_2019.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Descrizione: Estratto della rivistsa
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print/Accepted manuscript
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
766.16 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
766.16 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.