The aim of this paper is to show that Honneth’s philosophy of history is teleological in a narrow sense. This teleological character is problematic for the theory of the struggle for recognition, for the conception of history as such, and for the methodology of the normative reconstruction. In particular, the teleological conception gives to the theory of recognition a historical form that points out a unilateral character. Furthermore, the teleological neo-Hegelian methodology of normative reconstruction seems to adopt a too stark trust in the progress of human societies faced with the problem of social, political and cultural regressions.
Teleologie senza Spirito? Sui deficit politici della filosofia della storia di Honneth
Solinas, Marco
2018-01-01
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to show that Honneth’s philosophy of history is teleological in a narrow sense. This teleological character is problematic for the theory of the struggle for recognition, for the conception of history as such, and for the methodology of the normative reconstruction. In particular, the teleological conception gives to the theory of recognition a historical form that points out a unilateral character. Furthermore, the teleological neo-Hegelian methodology of normative reconstruction seems to adopt a too stark trust in the progress of human societies faced with the problem of social, political and cultural regressions.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
SOLINAS-TELEOLOGIE HONNETH - CON INDICE -2018.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print/Accepted manuscript
Licenza:
PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione
321.38 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
321.38 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.