Background: Four GGT fractions (b-, m-, s-, and f-GGT) have been identified in human plasma and their concentrations and ratios vary in different pathological conditions. Aim: To assess the behavior of fractional GGT in cirrhotic patients evaluated for liver transplantation. Methods: This was a single-center, cross-sectional study; GGT fractions were determined by gel-filtration chromatography. Results: 264 cirrhotic patients (215 males; median age 54.5 years) were included and compared against a group of 200 healthy individuals (100 males; median age 41.5). Median (25th-75th percentile) total and fractional GGT were higher in cirrhotics, with s-GGT showing the greatest increase [36.6 U/L (21.0-81.4) vs. 5.6 U/L (3.2-10.2), (p<0.0001)], while the median b-GGT/s-GGT ratio was lower in cirrhotics than in healthy controls [0.06 (0.04-0.10)] vs. 0.28 (0.20-0.40), p<0.0001]. The ratio showed higher diagnostic accuracy (ROC-AUC, 95% CI: 0.951, 0.927-0.969) then either s-GGT (0.924, 0.897-0.947; p<0.05) or total GGT (0.900, 0.869-0.925; p<0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of the ratio was maintained (0.940, 0.907-0.963) in cirrhotic patients (n=113) with total GGT values within the reference range. The s-GGT fraction consisted of two components, with one (s2-GGT) showing a significant positive correlation with serum AST, ALT, LDH, ALP and bilirubin, and negative with albumin. The b-GGT fraction showed a positive correlation with albumin, fibrinogen, and platelet counts, and negative with INR, bilirubin and LDH. Conclusions: The ratio performs as a sensitive biomarker of the liver parenchymal rearrangement, irrespective of etiology of cirrhosis and presence of hepatocellular carcinoma, even in patients with total GGT values within the reference range.

Circulating gamma-glutamyltransferase fractions in cirrhosis.

FRANZINI, Maria;
2014-01-01

Abstract

Background: Four GGT fractions (b-, m-, s-, and f-GGT) have been identified in human plasma and their concentrations and ratios vary in different pathological conditions. Aim: To assess the behavior of fractional GGT in cirrhotic patients evaluated for liver transplantation. Methods: This was a single-center, cross-sectional study; GGT fractions were determined by gel-filtration chromatography. Results: 264 cirrhotic patients (215 males; median age 54.5 years) were included and compared against a group of 200 healthy individuals (100 males; median age 41.5). Median (25th-75th percentile) total and fractional GGT were higher in cirrhotics, with s-GGT showing the greatest increase [36.6 U/L (21.0-81.4) vs. 5.6 U/L (3.2-10.2), (p<0.0001)], while the median b-GGT/s-GGT ratio was lower in cirrhotics than in healthy controls [0.06 (0.04-0.10)] vs. 0.28 (0.20-0.40), p<0.0001]. The ratio showed higher diagnostic accuracy (ROC-AUC, 95% CI: 0.951, 0.927-0.969) then either s-GGT (0.924, 0.897-0.947; p<0.05) or total GGT (0.900, 0.869-0.925; p<0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of the ratio was maintained (0.940, 0.907-0.963) in cirrhotic patients (n=113) with total GGT values within the reference range. The s-GGT fraction consisted of two components, with one (s2-GGT) showing a significant positive correlation with serum AST, ALT, LDH, ALP and bilirubin, and negative with albumin. The b-GGT fraction showed a positive correlation with albumin, fibrinogen, and platelet counts, and negative with INR, bilirubin and LDH. Conclusions: The ratio performs as a sensitive biomarker of the liver parenchymal rearrangement, irrespective of etiology of cirrhosis and presence of hepatocellular carcinoma, even in patients with total GGT values within the reference range.
2014
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2014b Cirrhosis fractions.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print/Accepted manuscript
Licenza: Licenza non conosciuta
Dimensione 251.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
251.08 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11382/448575
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
social impact